Macroeconomics

‭The‬ ‭tax‬ ‭multiplier‬ ‭calculates‬ ‭the‬‭effect‬‭of‬‭an‬‭increase‬‭or‬‭decrease‬ ‭in‬ ‭taxes‬‭on‬‭real‬‭GDP‬ ‭.‬‭Since‬‭higher‬‭taxes‬‭reduce‬‭GDP‬‭by‬‭decreasing‬ ‭consumption,‬‭and‬‭lower‬‭taxes‬‭raise‬‭GDP‬‭by‬‭increasing‬‭consumption,‬ ‭the‬ ‭tax‬‭multiplier‬‭is‬‭always‬‭negative‬ ‭.‬‭It‬‭is‬‭also‬‭consistently‬ ‭less‬‭in‬ ‭magnitude‬‭than‬‭the‬‭expenditure‬‭multiplier‬ ‭,‬‭meaning‬‭that‬‭the‬‭effect‬ ‭of‬‭a‬‭change‬‭in‬‭spending‬‭is‬‭larger‬‭than‬‭the‬‭effect‬‭of‬‭the‬‭same‬‭change‬ ‭in‬‭taxes‬‭on‬‭real‬‭GDP‬‭and‬‭the‬‭economy.‬‭This‬‭is‬‭due‬‭to‬‭the‬‭fact‬‭that‬‭the‬ ‭impact‬ ‭of‬ ‭taxes‬ ‭is‬ ‭not‬ ‭direct.‬ ‭While‬ ‭government‬ ‭spending‬ ‭and‬ ‭investment‬ ‭are‬ ‭direct‬ ‭components‬ ‭of‬ ‭AD,‬ ‭taxes‬ ‭are‬ ‭indirect‬ ‭components‬ ‭that‬ ‭affect‬ ‭consumption‬ ‭or‬ ‭investment,‬ ‭which‬ ‭in‬ ‭turn,‬ ‭affect real GDP.‬

‭The tax multiplier is calculated as follows:‬ ‭=‬ − ‭ ‭ ‬ ‬‭‬ − ‭1‬‭‬−‭‭‬‭ ‬ ‬‭‬ ‭For‬ ‭example,‬‭if‬‭MPS‬‭in‬‭an‬‭economy‬‭is‬‭0.4,‬‭we‬‭can‬‭deduce‬‭that‬‭MPC‬‭=‬‭1‬‭−‬‭0.4‬‭=‬‭0.6.‬‭Therefore,‬‭the‬‭tax‬ ‭multiplier is −0.6/0.4 = −1.5.‬ ‭Now‬‭assume‬‭that‬‭an‬‭economy‬‭has‬‭a‬‭real‬‭GDP‬‭of‬‭$5‬‭billion‬‭and‬‭an‬‭MPC‬‭of‬‭0.3.‬‭How‬‭would‬‭a‬‭$30‬‭million‬ ‭increase in taxes affect this real GDP?‬ ‭Tax multiplier =‬ ‭−0.3/0.7 ≈ −0.4.‬ ‭Final impact on GDP = tax multiplier × tax change‬ ‭= −0.4 × $30 million = −$12 million.‬ ‭Tax multiplier =‬

‭Therefore, real GDP will decrease by $12 million.‬

‭New real GDP level‬ ‭= $5 billion − $12 million = $4.988‬‭billion.‬ ‭Definition of Crowding-Out Efect‬

‭When‬ ‭the‬ ‭government‬ ‭increases‬ ‭its‬ ‭purchases‬ ‭or‬ ‭lowers‬ ‭taxes‬ ‭as‬ ‭part‬ ‭of‬ ‭its‬ ‭fscal‬ ‭policy,‬‭it‬‭increases‬ ‭money‬‭injections‬‭into‬‭the‬‭economy.‬‭This‬‭additional‬‭money‬‭stimulates‬‭consumer‬‭spending‬‭and‬‭business‬ ‭investments.‬ ‭As‬ ‭consumers‬ ‭spend‬ ‭more,‬ ‭businesses‬ ‭produce‬ ‭more,‬‭leading‬‭to‬‭increased‬‭incomes‬‭and‬ ‭even‬ ‭more‬ ‭consumer‬ ‭spending.‬ ‭This‬ ‭chain‬ ‭reaction‬ ‭continues,‬ ‭amplifying‬ ‭the‬ ‭initial‬ ‭impact.‬ ‭The‬ ‭multiplier‬ ‭effect,‬ ‭as‬ ‭we’ve‬ ‭seen,‬ ‭measures‬ ‭how‬ ‭much‬ ‭an‬ ‭initial‬ ‭change‬ ‭in‬ ‭spending‬ ‭or‬ ‭income‬ ‭multiplies‬ ‭throughout‬ ‭the‬ ‭economy‬ ‭.‬ ‭For‬‭example,‬‭if‬‭the‬‭government‬‭increases‬‭spending‬‭by‬‭$20‬‭billion‬

‭and‬ ‭the‬ ‭multiplier‬ ‭is‬ ‭4,‬ ‭the‬ ‭overall‬ ‭increase‬ ‭in‬ ‭demand‬ ‭for‬‭goods‬‭and‬‭services‬‭could‬‭be‬‭$80‬‭billion‬ ‭(4 times the initial spending increase).‬ ‭However,‬ ‭fscal‬ ‭policy‬ ‭can‬ ‭also‬ ‭have‬ ‭unintended‬ ‭consequences‬ ‭.‬ ‭When‬ ‭the‬ ‭government‬ ‭increases‬ ‭spending,‬‭it‬‭often‬‭needs‬‭to‬‭borrow‬‭money‬‭to‬‭fnance‬ ‭it.‬ ‭This‬ ‭increases‬ ‭the‬ ‭demand‬ ‭for‬ ‭loans,‬ ‭which,‬ ‭in‬

‭88‬

‭© 2024 ACHIEVE ULTIMATE CREDIT-BY-EXAM GUIDE‬‭|‬‭MACROECONOMICS‬

Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker