Human Growth and Development

It's crucial to understand the distinction between correlation and causation in research. This distinction helps us accurately interpret data and avoid drawing erroneous conclusions about relationships between variables.

Example: A study finds a correlation between the amount of screen time children have each day and their academic performance. Specifically, the study shows that children who spend more hours on screens tend to have lower grades in school. Correlation Observed: There is a negative correlation between screen time and academic performance. Misinterpretation: Causation assumed. One might hastily conclude that increased screen time causes poor academic performance. This assumption implies causation without sufficient evidence. Potential Explanations: 1.​ Directionality Problem: While it's possible that spending more time on screens leads to less time for homework and studying, which could lower grades, the reverse could also be true. Children struggling academically might use screens as an escape or distraction from their difficulties with schoolwork. 2.​ Third Variable Problem: There could be a third factor, such as parental involvement or socioeconomic status, that influences both screen time and academic performance. For instance, children from families with less parental supervision might spend more time on screens and also receive less academic support, affecting their grades. Research Design to Establish Causation To prove causation, researchers must control for other factors that could influence results. The best methods for this are experiments and longitudinal studies. 1.​ Experimental Study (Controlled Experiment) ●​ Method: Children are randomly assigned to different levels of screen time. ●​ Goal: Measure the effects of screen time on academic performance while controlling for other factors like socioeconomic status and parental involvement. ●​ Advantage: Allows researchers to isolate cause and effect. 2.​ Longitudinal Study (Tracking Over Time) ●​ Method: A group of children is studied over several years to see if changes in screen time occur before changes in academic performance. ●​ Goal: To determine if screen time is a cause or just a correlation while considering other influencing factors. ●​ Advantage: Tracks natural development over time, reducing biases from artificial lab conditions.

© 2025 ACHIEVE ULTIMATE CREDIT-BY-EXAM GUIDE | HUMAN GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT